Wow, awkward doodle. The child has a giant hole in his groin.
(It also has to be apparent at this point in my doodleography that these doodles were inspired by Michael Showalter’s doodles, which were probably inspired by Pablo Picasso’s doodles. My point being, while other peoples’ imitation may perhaps be considered “unoriginal”, mine are instead “high art.”)
But what I really want to talk about is the fact that no one in America is talking about Charlie Davies!
Well, okay, the vast majority of America is not. And if that’s not indication of the state of our national soccer culture, I don’t know what is.
For those who don’t know, US Men’s National Team striker Charlie Davies was seriously injured in a car crash on Oct. 13. The accident killed the driver and injured the other two passengers, one of whom was Davies, riding in the backseat. Davies suffered a broken femur and tibia, lacerated bladder and facial injuries. And while you hate to speculate on career implications – you’d just hope for his return to good health first – the injuries are considered possibly career-threatening. It’s a virtual certainty that he’ll miss the 2010 World Cup in South Africa.
Yet nobody really seems to know about this. Or, beyond the immediate human angle, care. And that’s really disappointing to me. Especially after so much interest was stirred by the Yanks in the 2009 Confederations Cup, where they lost 3-2 to Brazil in the final game.
I guess it just points to our love-hate relationship with soccer in this country, though. We love it when it’s cool to love it, when the team is winning and ESPN is hyping their performance. We don’t love it when a World Cup qualifier is only available on closed-circuit television at select bars or, worse, Telemundo. We love it when everyone at the water cooler is talking about Clint Dempsey’s diving header to spark a win over Egypt. We don’t love it when the team loses or draws, because that’s inherently un-American!
What puzzles me, though, is that we seem to have raised a soccer generation. I know mine is. We grew up playing the sport, it’s widely encouraged to follow international club teams, particularly in the English Premier League. People can rattle off the names of players from Chelsea, ManU, Madrid, Tottenham, Milan, etc. But they shrug their shoulders at a rising star who had been dominating at French club Sochaux and was probably the Yanks’ best scoring threat looking forward to next year’s Cup?
Incredible.
I’m not trying to make this too much about soccer because of the respect I have for Davies and well-wishes for his recovery first-and-foremost, to enjoy a regular life, or whatever variation of it one could have after an accident as violent as the one on Oct. 13. But this really does paint a larger picture of soccer culture in the United States, and I don’t think it’s a particularly good one. Not at a time when soccer culture seemed to be gaining momentum, fans seemed to be tuning into the men’s national team and there seemed to be an extremely bright future for the Yanks.
Now, their 2010 World Cup hopes are at least dampened – if not altogether destroyed – by the loss of their star striker. And so, too, might be our hopes for culminating a cohesive national soccer culture.
I guess I wonder what would happen if the world held something like a basketball World Cup. Yeah, there’s Olympic basketball, but that always should be a one-sided event with the US taking home gold every year. But if the talent base were more spread out internationally – and the talent base is spreading – and more nations cared about the results, if there was some sort of international tournament with the type of prestige associated with a World Cup.
I guess I would wonder how America would react if, say, Kobe Bryant were to be in the same situation Charlie Davies was in. Not that I wish that on him or anything, knock on wood it doesn’t happen. But how would America react then? Very strongly. Hell, they’d react strongly even now, without the existence of such a tournament. The Lakers’ title hopes would go down the drain and an overwhelming number of bandwagon fans would be searching for the next jersey to buy. Losing Kobe would have a tremendous impact on America. As would losing Tom Brady if there were some sort of international football tournament held every four years.
You get the idea.
But Davies finds himself in a career-threatening situation, and it’s news for a day on ESPN. Then America brushes it off. I have wonder, why? Especially if we claim to be fostering a growing soccer culture. Because if we really cared about soccer in this country, we would care more about the Davies story.
The United States just lost perhaps their best striker. That, in my book, is very big news in the national sporting community.

Posted by Collin 

